Woodall v. Swift & Co.

Luke, J.

1. There was no conflict in the evidence, and it demanded a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. It was therefore not error for the court to direct such a verdict.

2. The ground of the motion for a new trial which complains of the exclusion of evidence is without merit. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.