DocketNumber: 7456
Citation Numbers: 18 Ga. App. 312, 89 S.E. 374, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 323
Judges: Wade
Filed Date: 6/27/1916
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
1. In the absence of evidence affirmatively showing that the witness who was said to be in Florida was only temporarily beyond the limits of this State, or tending to show that he would probably be present at the next term of court, the trial judge, in overruling the motion for a continuance, did not abuse the discretion vested in him.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict. Judgment affirmed.