DocketNumber: 7243
Citation Numbers: 18 Ga. App. 459
Judges: Hodges
Filed Date: 7/19/1916
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
1. Attorneys suing to judgment, and receiving payment on the judgment in the names of their clients, will not be heard to dispute the title of their clients to money caught by summons of garnishment, by setting up, in answer to the summons of garnishment, that the money in their hands was the individual property of only one of their clients, as they are estopped from attacking the suit so filed, the judgment rendered thereon, and their satisfaction of the fi. fa. based upon the judgment.
2. Suit was brought in the name of husband and wife, and judgment was rendered in their favor. The fi. fa. was paid to their attorneys of
3. The rúlings complained of, as to the admissibility of evidence, if error, were harmless. The charge of the court covered the issues that should have been submitted. The verdict finding in favor of the traverse was authorized, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.