DocketNumber: 10167
Judges: Broyles
Filed Date: 5/14/1919
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/8/2024
1. Under the pleadings and the evidence, the court did not'err in directing a verdict for the defendant, or in refusing to grant a new trial.
2. Even if the rejection of testimony as complained of in’ the motion for a new trial was error, it does not, under all the facts of the case, require a reversal of the judgment below.
Judgment affirmed.