Knight v. State

Broyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new t?ial, complaining of the repelling of certain testimony offered by the accused, cannot be considered, as the amendment is not complete and understandable without a reference to other parts of the record.

2. The case was submitted to the judge without the intervention of a jury, and the evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.