Wynn v. State

Luke, J.

The evidence did not authorize the defendant’s conviction of larceny, beyond a reasonable doubt and to the exclusion of every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. It was therefore error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. A. H. Freeman, for plaintiff in error. William Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, contra.