Dixon v. State

Luke, J.

Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court, the question whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict cannot be tested by direct exception, in the absence of a- motion for a new trial. See Schroeder v. Schroeder, 144 Ga. 119 (3) (86 S. E. 224). It follows that the verdict must stand and the judgment be affirmed.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., amd Bloodworth, J., concur.