Patterson v. State

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the conviction; the charge of the court, when read in its entirety, is not erroneous for the reasons pointed out in the specific assignments of error; the court, in refusing to grant the motion for a continuance, did not abuse the discretion invested by law; and for no reason pointed out by the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., eonew.