Beaver v. State

Bboxles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence. There was an acute conflict between the evidence for the State and the evidence for the accused, but the jury, as they had a right to do, evidently believed the witnesses for the State and discredited the testimony of the witnesses for the defense. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment below overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.