Dill v. State

Bboyles, C. J.

1. The judge did not err in overruling the grounds of the motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, as the evidence was impeaching in its character, and there was also a counter-showing .(as to some of this evidence) by the State.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.