DocketNumber: 18545
Judges: Luke
Filed Date: 12/13/1927
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/8/2024
The court did not err in overruling the motion for a continuance. The evidence demanded the defendant’s conviction, and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.'
■Judgment affirmed. Broyles, G. J., cmd Bloodtoorth, J., concur.