DocketNumber: 18636
Citation Numbers: 38 Ga. App. 78, 142 S.E. 753, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 43
Judges: Luke
Filed Date: 4/10/1928
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
This case arose in a contest as to the priority of the respective claims of the parties to funds arising from the sale of described land, Mrs. M. A. Hodges (the plaintiff in the trial court, but now the defendant in error) claiming under an unrecorded bond for title which, as security for a loan, had been transferred to her by J. L. Roberts, A. T. Woodward, and L. S. Roberts (who took it from J. W. Lovejoy and J. H. Baskins, the original owners of the land), and the plaintiffs in error claiming under a security deed to Harry L. Winters Inc. from J. L. Roberts, one of the obligees in the bond for title, which deed, after several transfers to others, was finally transferred to the plaintiffs in error. Hpon an agreed statement of facts the ease was submitted to the court, to be tried without the intervention of a jury, and the court held that the claim of Mrs. Hodges was superior to that of the plaintiffs in error.
The substance of the agreed statements of fact appears from the following: On January 22,1918, J. W. Lovejoy and J. H. Baskins executed and delivered to Charles Forman a deed to certain land to secure the payment of a note for $2000. The deed was recorded March 2, 1918. On January 15, 1920, the makers of that deed executed and delivered to J. L. Roberts, A. T. Woodward, and L. S. Roberts a bond for title conditioned to make title to the said land upon the payment of certain purchase-money notes given by them for the land, and of the said Forman note. The bond for title was never recorded. J. L. Roberts entered into immediate possession of the land, and retained possession thereof until about January 1, 1927. On January 20, 1920, J. L. Roberts, Woodward, and L. S. Roberts borrowed from Mrs. M. A. Hodges $2500, giving her their joint note for it, due January 20, 1921, and transferred to her, as security for its payment, the said bond for title. This transfer was never recorded. On January 31, 1922, J. L. Roberts executed and delivered to Harry L. Winter Inc. a deed to the said land to secure a note for $5000. The security deed was not recorded until February 14, 1922. The $5000 was not actually delivered to J. L. Roberts until after the execution and delivery to him of the warranty deed next hereinafter mentioned. The security deed from
The court adjudged that Mrs. Hodges had a superior lien on the fund arising from the sale of the land to that claimed by W. L. Fender and Y. F. Carter under the Harry L. Winter Inc. security deed, and rendered judgment against W. L. Fender and Y. F. Carter as principals, and J. Floyd Fender Jr. as surety, for the full amount of principal, interest, costs and attorney’s fees recovered by Mrs. Hodges in her said suit against J. L. Eoberts, A. T. Woodward and L. S. Eoberts.
The first conveyance of the land in question (so far as shown by the record in this case) was by security deed from Love joy and Baskins to Forman, dated January 22, 1918, and recorded March 2, 1918. After many deeds and transfers between various parties, this original security deed finally came into the hands of Mrs. Hodges by a transfer to her from Continental Casualty Company, dated February 26, 1927, and recorded March 9, 1927. By a contract between the parties litigant this security deed is recognized as' a superior lien on the land; but reference thereto is made because it tends to show the consistency and sequence of Mrs. Hodges’ title, and because Carter and Fender obtained their alleged title between the dates of these two conveyances. It is also material to note that the notes and the security deed under which Carter and Fender claim were acquired by them after maturity of the notes.
Beference to the foregoing statement of facts will show that on
Carter and Fender claim as successors in title to Winter Inc., which acquired a security deed from Roberts on January 31, 1922. Since at that time there was absolutely no record of any title whatever in Roberts, ordinary diligence would have put Winter Inc. upon inquiry which would have disclosed that Mrs. Hodges was the holder of the bond for title to the said property. “Notice sufficient to excite attention and put a party on inquiry is notice of everything to which it is afterwards found such inquiry might have led. Ignorance of a fact, due to negligence, is equivalent to knowledge, in fixing the rights of the parties.” Civil Code (1910), § 4530. See also Waller v. Neil, 117 Ga. 746 (45 S. E. 387); Picklesimer v. Smith, 164 Ga. 600 (2) (139 S. E. 72). However, since the claim of the plaintiffs in error comes through the deed from Roberts to Winter Inc., dated January 31, 1922, and since on that date Roberts had no title to the property nor even a right to title, he having previously on January 20, 1920, transferred to Mrs. Hodges his bond for title, Roberts had nothing to convey to Winter Inc., and Winter Inc., though it may have purchased in good faith, acquired nothing. “A purchaser in good faith from one who has no title, in ignorance of the rights of the true owner, obtains no title. He is not such an innocent purchaser as would be protected from the title of the owner.” Compton v. Cassada, 54 Ga. 74 (2).
Under the law and the agreed statement of facts, the court did not err in holding that the lien of Mrs. Hodges upon the funds arising'from the sale of the land was superior to that of the plaintiffs in error; and the judgment rendered in her favor is
Affirmed.