DocketNumber: 38487
Judges: Nichols
Filed Date: 9/27/1960
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/7/2024
The defendant contends, in support of the trial court’s judgment granting his motion for nonsuit, that, even if the plaintiffs proved their case as laid, if the evidence further showed that they were not entitled tó recover, then the nonsuit was proper. See Cadranel v. Wildwood Construction Co., 101 Ga. App. 630 (115 S. E. 2d 415); and Code § 110-310.
In the present case the defendant’s general demurrer to the petition was overruled and no exception was taken to such judgment. Therefore such judgment established the law of the case and unless such judgment is reversed the plaintiffs are entitled to a verdict if the allegations of the petition are proved. “ ‘A plaintiff is entitled to prove everything he alleges in a petition upon which he is permitted to go to trial without objection on the part of the defendant.’ Mayor &c. of Macon v. Melton, 115 Ga. 153, 156 (41 S. E. 499); Overstreet v. W. T. Rawleigh Co., 75 Ga. App. 483 (2) (43 S. E. 2d 774).” Cloud v. Stewart, 92 Ga. App. 247, 250 (88 S. E. 2d 323). See also as to the law of the case being established by rulings on demurrers, Harris v. Robertson, 97 Ga. App. 341 (103 S. E. 2d 95); and Reeves v. Madray, 101 Ga. App. 300 (113 S. E. 2d 651). The law of the case, as established by the judgment overruling the defendant’s general demurrer, authorized the plaintiffs to prove that there was a binding oral agreement which was not merged in the written warranty deed. The original purchase contract was pleaded as an exhibit to the petition and contained the provision that: “This contract constitutes the sole and entire agreement between the parties hereto and no modification of the contract shall be binding unless attached hereto and signed by all parties to this agreement. No representation, promise, or inducement not included in this contract shall be binding upon any party hereto.”
Judgment reversed.