DocketNumber: 29878.
Judges: Stephens, Sutton, Felton
Filed Date: 3/9/1943
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
A stockholder of a railroad corporation is not liable for a person's injury resulting from the operation of a train of such corporation over its line of railroad, although such stockholder is a railroad corporation and owns approximately half of the capital stock of the negligent railroad corporation.
In the defendants' answer they denied liability, denied that they or either of them operated the Western Railway of Alabama as lessee, and denied that the train on which the plaintiff was traveling at the time she was injured was operated by these defendants *Page 213 or either of them. They also pleaded to the jurisdiction, setting up, among other things, that they were not lessees of the Western Railway of Alabama. This plea was heard before the judge, who tried it on the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts, from which it affirmatively appeared that the defendants were not lessees of the Western Railway of Alabama, but that they held in trust, by virtue of a transfer thereof by the Georgia Railroad Banking Company to the defendants as assignees of William M. Wadley, 14,997 shares of the capital stock of the Western Railway of Alabama, "with the right to the possession of those shares of stock and the right to collect and use the dividends thereon;" which stock was to be so held in trust during the remainder of the Georgia Railroad lease to William M. Wadley, which was a 99-year lease, dated April 1, 1881, and which was assigned to these defendants. It appeared that the Western Railway of Alabama was incorporated for $3,000,000; 30,000 shares of stock at $100 each. The judge sustained the plea, and the plaintiff excepted.
The fact that the defendants are owners of a part of the capital stock of the Western Railway of Alabama, on the line which the plaintiff was injured, would not render them liable as stockholders for personal injuries caused by the negligent operation of its trains by the Western Railway of Alabama. The defendants, as stockholders, are separate and apart from the railroad corporation, the stock of which they hold in trust. These defendants would be no more liable as stockholders than would the owners and holders of the remaining 15,003 shares of the stock of the Western Railway of Alabama. See Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.,
Judgment affirmed. Sutton and Felton, JJ., concur. *Page 214