Jumar Greer v. State

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
November 20, 2017
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A17A1451. JUMAR GREER v. THE STATE.
Jumar Greer seeks to appeal from his judgment of conviction. But for reasons
explained below, this case is not final and ripe for appeal, and it is hereby
REMANDED WITH DIRECTION.
Greer was indicted for multiple felonies. At a trial thereon, a jury found him
guilty on six counts. Thereafter, the trial court entered a judgment of conviction,
which provided a written sentence upon four of the counts. The trial court did not
enter written sentences on the remaining two counts, nor did the court enter a notation
showing that those counts either merged into other counts for purposes of sentencing
or were vacated by operation of law.
In Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 (571 SE2d 806) (2002), the Georgia Supreme
Court held: “[W]hen multiple counts of an indictment are tried together and the trial
court does not enter a written sentence on one or more of the counts, the case is still
pending in the trial court and is not a final judgment under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1).”
Keller, 275 Ga. at 681. More recently, in State v. Riggs, 301 Ga. 63 (799 SE2d 770)
(2017), the Supreme Court elaborated, “Entering a written sentence on each count for
purposes of the final judgment rule requires the trial court to enter either (a) a written
sentence on the count or (b) a written notation that the count merged into another
count for purposes of sentencing or was vacated by operation of law.” (Emphasis
supplied.) Id. at 65 (1), n. 4.
Here, with respect to each count of which Greer was found guilty, the trial
court did not enter either a written sentence or a written notation that the count either
merged or was vacated.
Since the trial court did not [do so], [Greer’s] case is still pending in the
trial court and is not ripe for appeal. Therefore, this case is remanded
with direction for the trial court to enter a written sentence [or written
notation] disposing of all counts of which [Greer] was found guilty.
After such entry, the case may be transmitted to this Court for re-
docketing because the notice of appeal, prematurely filed, then will have
ripened.
(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Perry v. State, 329 Ga. App. 121, 121 (764
SE2d 178) (2014) (remanding the case as “not final and ripe for appeal,” where
despite trial court’s oral announcements at the sentencing hearing that certain counts
would merge into others, the court did not enter for each count either a written
sentence or written notation of merger); see Riggs, 301 Ga. at 65 (1), n. 4; Keller, 275
Ga. at 681 (explaining that where the trial court did not enter a sentence on a count
of the multi-count indictment following the jury’s verdict, case “was not ripe for
appeal at that time even though the trial court did enter a written judgment of
conviction and sentence on the other counts of the indictment”); Bass v. State, 284
Ga. App. 331, 332 (643 SE2d 851) (2007) (remanding the case as “not ripe for
appeal,” where, with respect to each count of which appellant was found guilty, the
trial court had not either entered a written sentence or made written notation that the
count merged), cited with approval in Riggs, 301 Ga. at 65 (1), n. 4.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
11/20/2017
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.