DocketNumber: A14A0302
Citation Numbers: 327 Ga. App. 271, 758 S.E.2d 334, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 1335, 2014 WL 1758899, 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 315
Judges: Andrews
Filed Date: 5/5/2014
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024
The State initiated administrative forfeiture proceedings under OCGA § 16-13-49 (n) against various personal property with a value of less than $25,000 owned by Jacqueline M. Alonso and Brandy N. Espiritu. The trial court dismissed the State’s complaint for forfeiture on the basis that the complaint was not timely filed, and the State
The State seized the property
OCGA § 16-13-49 (h) (2) provides: “Within 60 days from the date of seizure, a complaint for forfeiture shall be initiated as provided for in subsection (n), (o), or (p) of this Code section.” However, subsection (n) sets forth an alternative to immediately filing a civil complaint where the seized property is worth less than $25,000. In such a case, the State may simply provide notice of the seizure and wait for a claimant to file a claim. Then, if a claim to the seized property is filed within 30 days of the notice [as set forth in subsection (n)], the State must file a civil complaint within 30 days of actual receipt of the claim. OCGA § 16-13-49 (n) (5).
State of Ga. v. Profitt, 213 Ga. App. 270 (444 SE2d 356) (1994); Robinson v. State of Ga., 209 Ga. App. 446, 447 (433 SE2d 707) (1993). The State’s complaint filed pursuant to the administrative procedures set forth in OCGA § 16-13-49 (n) seeking forfeiture of seized property valued at less than $25,000 was timely filed within 30 days of receipt of the claims made by Alonso and Espiritu.
Judgment reversed.
Alleging that the property was used to facilitate violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, the State seized an automobile, currency and a currency counter, and various computer equipment.