Sellman v. State

Luke, J.

Plaintiffs in error were convicted of the oifense of simple larceny. The evidence did not authorize the conviction of the defendants upon the indictment. Eor this reason the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Broyles, O. J., dissents. Scott, Hornbuclcle & Moore, for plaintiffs in error. John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, 1L A. Stephens, Ralph H. Pharr, contra.