Adams v. State

Broyles, C. J.

Under the undisputed facts of this case, the circumstantial evidence relied upon to convict the defendant failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt; and, therefore, his conviction was contrary to law and the evidence.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Frank H. Harris, for plaintiff in error. F. M, Scarlett Jr,, solicitor, contra: