Smith v. State

Per Curiam.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of gaming. His case is here upon the sole assignment of error that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. Upon a careful examination of the evidence we are convinced that there is some evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur Luke, J., dissents.