DocketNumber: 22016
Judges: Broyles
Filed Date: 2/17/1932
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/8/2024
While the evidence connecting the defendant with the offense charged (simple-larceny) was wholly circumstantial, it was sufficient to authorize the jury 'to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt; and the overruling of the motion for a new trial (based upon the general grounds only) was not error.
Judgment affirmed.