Terrell v. State

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of possessing whisky. The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt, and the refusal of the court to grant a new trial was not error. The cases cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error are distinguished by their particular facts from this case.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, J., concurs. Guerry, J., dissents. J. H. Tip Lon, for plaintiff in error.