DocketNumber: 43563
Citation Numbers: 118 Ga. App. 378, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1403, 163 S.E.2d 845
Judges: Eberhardt
Filed Date: 9/24/1968
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
The motion for summary judgment was
Plaintiff testified that shortly before the occurrence he tried to enter the room from the outside but was unable to get the door to slide, whereupon Mr. Jerald, the manager, was able to get the door open with the use of a screwdriver. The door was not opened again until plaintiff attempted to go out of the room. Mr. Jerald, however, stated in his affidavit that there had been no difficulty in operating the sliding glass door either before or after the incident. Jerome Portman stated in his affidavit that he went to the motel room after the occurrence to get plaintiff’s personal effects, and that he observed the badly shattered door “and noticed how it was hard to get to the opening mechanism. I tried to slide the door and it moved only with some difficulty.” The affidavit of the architect stated that a glass door of more than six square feet which was not equipped with a screen or push bar would not meet current safety standards. It appears that the door was more than twelve square feet, measuring 34" x 76", and that there was no screen or push bar but only a small handle which may have been difficult to reach because of the proximity of a sofa.
From the above there clearly remains a genuine issue of material fact (Code Ann. § 81A-156 (c)) as to whose negligence, if any, proximately caused the injuries complained of, and the judgment must be
Affirmed.