Rogers L. Hicks v. Chuck Clay

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
February 24, 2021
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A21D0206. ROGERS L. HICKS v. CHUCK CLAY et al.
Rogers L. Hicks filed an action against Chuck Clay and Associates, LLC,
Charles Clay, Piasta Newbern and Walker, LLC (“PNW”), and Pissarro Wright for
tort, breach of contract and other claims. Wright filed a motion for default judgment
on his counterclaim against Hicks and requested a trial on the issue of damages on the
counterclaim. The trial court granted Wright’s motion, but left the damages issue
unresolved. PNW also filed a motion for entry of default judgment on its
counterclaim against Hicks and requested a hearing on damages on its counterclaim.
Hicks then filed a “Motion for Relief from Default Judgment on Counterclaim
Granted to Defendant,” alleging that he did not receive notice of the court’s order
requiring him to answer the counterclaim. The court entered an order granting PNW’s
motion for default judgment on its counterclaim and denying Hicks’s motion for relief
from the default judgment on the counterclaim, apparently without holding a trial on
or resolving the issue of damages sought on the counterclaims. Hicks filed this
application for discretionary appeal from that order.
It is incumbent upon an appellate court to inquire into its jurisdiction. Todd v.
Todd, 287 Ga. 250, 250 (1) (703 SE2d 597) (2010). Hicks filed an application for
discretionary appeal in this case, but the judgment at issue is not one of the rulings
subject to a discretionary appeal application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a).1
1
Notably, OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8) requires the filing of an application for
discretionary appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment brought
under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), but Hicks’s motion for relief from the judgment was
Nor is the judgment directly appealable under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a). The entry
of default is not a final ruling if the issue of damages remains pending in the trial
court. See Rapid Taxi Co. v. Broughton, 244 Ga. App. 427, 428 (1) (535 SE2d 780)
(2000) (judgment is not final unless it disposes of the entire case, leaving nothing for
the trial court to do); Holloway v. McMichael, 151 Ga. App. 802, 802 (261 SE2d 747)
(1979) (case not final where issue of damages reserved). Based on the limited
materials filed with the application, it appears that the issue of damages on the
counterclaims remains pending below. And while an appellant has a right to file a
direct appeal from a final judgment denying a motion to set aside a judgment made
pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (g), it appears that no final judgment has been entered
in this case. See generally Smithson v. Harry Norman, 192 Ga. App. 796, 796 (1)
(386 SE2d 546) (1989). It was Hicks’s burden, as applicant, to provide sufficient
materials to show that the judgment at issue is final and that this Court has
jurisdiction. See generally Court of Appeals Rule 31 (f); Harper v. Harper, 259 Ga.
246, 246 (378 SE2d 673) (1989).
Under the circumstances, Hicks was required to comply with the interlocutory
appeal procedure and obtain a certificate of immediate review. See OCGA § 5-6-34
(b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435, 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989). Because Hicks
failed to do so, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal
is hereby DISMISSED. See Holloway, 151 Ga. App. at 803.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
02/24/2021
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
filed pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (g) (involving relief from judgments due to clerical
errors).