DocketNumber： No. 6387.
Citation Numbers： 65 P.2d 736, 57 Idaho 316
Judges： GIVENS, J.
Filed Date： 2/3/1937
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 1/12/2023
After examination of the record in this case I am fully satisfied that the judgment should be affirmed. However in my opinion assignment of error numbered "1" that "the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion for a continuance" is not here for review. The rule is well established that where the substance of the motion for a continuance does not appear in the record, files, minutes or transcript, the motion is not subject to review. (I. C. A., sec.
No prejudicial error was committed by the trial court in the admission or exclusion of evidence.
When the instructions are considered as a whole, those given state the law as applied to the facts and those rejected were properly refused.
The evidence is amply sufficient to support the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court based thereon.
Petition for rehearing denied. *Page 375
[EDITORS' NOTE: PICTURE IS ELECTRONICALLY NON-TRANSFERRABLE.] *Page 376
State v. Porter , 142 Idaho 371 ( 2005 )
State v. Birrueta , 98 Idaho 631 ( 1977 )
State v. Hall , 88 Idaho 117 ( 1964 )
State v. Fisk , 92 Idaho 675 ( 1968 )
State v. White , 93 Idaho 153 ( 1969 )
State v. Tiffany , 139 Idaho 909 ( 2004 )
State v. Thomas , 140 Idaho 632 ( 2004 )
State v. Weldon , 6 Utah 2d 372 ( 1957 )
State v. Gramenz , 256 Iowa 134 ( 1964 )
State v. Hirsch , 64 Idaho 20 ( 1942 )
State v. Frank , 60 Idaho 774 ( 1939 )
State v. Hargraves , 62 Idaho 8 ( 1940 )
State v. Baruth , 107 Idaho 651 ( 1984 )