State v. Jason Allan Shepperd

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Docket No. 37273
STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 698
)
Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: November 4, 2010
)
v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
)
JASON ALLAN SHEPPERD, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
) OPINION AND SHALL NOT
Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
)
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
County. Hon. Darla S. Williamson, District Judge.
Order denying motion for credit for time served, affirmed.
Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori Fleming, Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.
________________________________________________
LANSING, Chief Judge
In June 2007, Jason Allan Shepperd was convicted of felony stalking, Idaho Code § 18-
7905, and sentenced to a unified term of imprisonment of five years with one year fixed. About
two and one-half years later, he filed a motion for credit for time served, seeking credit against
his sentence for time spent in jail on a separate misdemeanor charge. The district court denied
the motion, and Shepperd appeals.
Idaho Code § 18-309 directs that one convicted of a crime “receive credit in the judgment
for any period of incarceration prior to entry of judgment, if such incarceration was for the
offense or an included offense for which the judgment was entered.” Thus, this entitlement to
credit is limited to the period of confinement served before judgment and attributable to the same
charge for which sentence is imposed. See State v. Hale, 116 Idaho 763, 765, 779 P.2d 438, 440
(Ct. App. 1989).
1
In the present case, Shepperd’s own affidavit filed in support of his motion states that he
is seeking credit for time spent in jail not as a consequence of the present stalking charge but as a
result of a new arrest on a separate misdemeanor. This new arrest occurred after he had been
released from jail pending disposition of his stalking charge. The documentation attached to his
affidavit likewise demonstrates that the incarceration for which he seeks credit was on the new
misdemeanor charge. Because Shepperd is not entitled to credit on his sentence in the present
case for time served in jail in a separate case, the district court correctly denied Shepperd’s
motion.
The district court’s order denying Shepperd’s motion for credit for time served is
affirmed.
Judge GUTIERREZ and Judge MELANSON CONCUR.
2