Filed Date: 2/27/2012
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 38685 STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 375 ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: February 27, 2012 ) v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk ) HANS MICHAEL HOLSOPPLE, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED ) OPINION AND SHALL NOT Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY ) Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Timothy Hansen, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and concurrent life sentences, with minimum periods of confinement of twenty years, for first degree kidnapping and rape, affirmed. Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Diane M. Walker, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. ________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GUTIERREZ, Judge PER CURIAM Hans Michael Holsopple pled guilty to first degree kidnapping,Idaho Code §§ 18-4501
, 18-4502, 18-204, 19-304, and rape,Idaho Code §§ 18-6101
, 19-304. The district court sentenced Holsopple to concurrent life terms, with twenty years determinate, for each count. Holsopple appeals. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez,121 Idaho 114
, 117-18,822 P.2d 1011
, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez,106 Idaho 447
, 449-51,680 P.2d 869
, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill,103 Idaho 565
, 568,650 P.2d 707
, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 1 the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver,144 Idaho 722
, 726,170 P.3d 387
, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Holsopple’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed 2