Filed Date: 9/2/2010
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 36778 STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 626 ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: September 2, 2010 ) v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk ) WILLIAM JESSE NORMAN, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED ) OPINION AND SHALL NOT Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY ) Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. John P. Luster, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years, for aggravated assault, affirmed. Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. ________________________________________________ Before LANSING, Chief Judge, GRATTON, Judge and MELANSON, Judge PER CURIAM William Jesse Norman was convicted of aggravated assault,Idaho Code §§ 18-901
, 18- 905, 19-2520. The district court imposed a unified sentence of eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years. Norman appeals, contending that the sentence is excessive. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez,121 Idaho 114
, 117-18,822 P.2d 1011
, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez,106 Idaho 447
, 449-51,680 P.2d 869
, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill,103 Idaho 565
, 568,650 P.2d 707
, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver,144 Idaho
1 722, 726,170 P.3d 387
, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Norman’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed. 2