State v. Victoriano Avila Serna

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Docket No. 45121
STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2018 Unpublished Opinion No. 314
)
Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: January 8, 2018
)
v. ) Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk
)
VICTORIANO AVILA SERNA, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
) OPINION AND SHALL NOT
Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
)
Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Bingham County. Hon. Darren B. Simpson, District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period
of confinement of five years, for felony driving under the influence, affirmed.
Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.
________________________________________________
Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;
and LORELLO, Judge
________________________________________________
PER CURIAM
Victoriano Avila Serna pled guilty to felony driving under the influence. I.C. §§ 18-
8004(1)(a) and 18-8005(6). In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed.
The district court sentenced Serna to a unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of
confinement of five years. Serna filed an I.C.R. 35 motion, which the district court denied.
Serna appeals.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
1
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Serna’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
2