Citation Numbers: 51 Ill. App. 349, 1893 Ill. App. LEXIS 587
Judges: Gary
Filed Date: 1/11/1894
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024
delivered the opinion op the Court.
The appellee is assignee in insolvency of Abraham G. Becker, surviving partner of the firm of Herman Schaffner & Co., private bankers in Chicago. The appellant kept an ordinary banking account with Schaffner & Co.
On the second day of June, 1893, Schaffner & Co. received in a letter, from the appellant, at Milwaukee, a check, payable to the order of the appellant upon a bank in Kansas, and indorsed by the appellant “ For deposit with Herman Schaffner & Co. to the credit of Gender & Paescheke Mfg. Co.”
The next day, the firm of Herman Schaffner & Co. being insolvent, Becker made the assignment to the appellee.
The payment of the check was stopped, the check returned to the appellee, and this is a petition by the appellant that the County Court should direct that it be surrendered to the appellant.
The County Court refused. Had the money on the check been paid and mingled with the funds of Schaffner & Co., in any of the ways by which commercial business is conducted, so that the identity was gone, the appellant would have no case. Mutual Acc. Ass’n v. Jacobs, 141 Ill. 261.
But the check not being paid, and remaining in the hands of the appellee, if it had been received by Schaffner & Co. with an actual intent to defraud the appellant of its value, the appellee would have no defense.
He is not a bona fide purchaser—merely a volunteer, standing in the shoes of Schaffner & Co., and subject to all claims for rescission that would have been good against them.
How, the statute, Ch. 38, Sec. 25a (Hurd), 118 (Starr & Curtis) makes this assignment prima facie evidence of the intent of Schaffner & Co., to defraud; whether by reason of insolvency or not, is foreign to the present inquiry.
The statute is in place of proof that Scliaffner & Co. received the check with intent to defraud the appellant, by what method, is immaterial.
The order of the County Court is reversed and the canse remanded to the County Court, with directions to that court to order the appellee to surrender the check to the appellant.