DocketNumber: No. 13,471.
Citation Numbers: 168 N.E. 26, 95 Ind. App. 577, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 427
Judges: Nichols
Filed Date: 10/3/1929
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
This was an action for damages in which there was a verdict for $1,000 for appellee on which judgment was rendered against appellant. A motion for a new trial was filed in the clerk's office, in term time. On the day that the motion was filed, appellant, in open court, had this entry made in the order book by the clerk: "Comes now the defendant and shows to the court the filing of a motion for a new trial *Page 578 in the clerk's office on March 30, 1928, which motion is in these words, (insert)." Motion was filed by appellee to strike out the motion for new trial and expunge the record entry for the reason that the same was not filed within the thirty days and in the manner as the law directs. This motion was sustained by the court and the motion for a new trial was stricken out. From this action and from the judgment rendered in the case, this appeal. It is contended by appellant that the striking of the motion for a new trial was reversible error.
It has been repeatedly held that a motion for a new trial must be filed and presented to the court, and that filing the same with the clerk will not be sufficient. Intermediate,
1, 2. etc., Co. v. Cunningham (1915),
The judgment is reversed with instructions to the court to overrule the motion to strike out the motion for a new trial, and for further proceedings. *Page 579