OPINION ON REHEARING Dec 16 2015, 8:49 am ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES P. Gregory Cross Thomas M. Beeman The Cross Law Firm, P.C. Kyle B. DeHaven Muncie, Indiana Beeman Law Office Anderson, Indiana Alexander M. Beeman Ciobanu Law, P.C. Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Scott Alan Stibbins, individually December 16, 2015 and as Personal Representative Court of Appeals Case No. of the Estate of Warren E. 18A02-1410-PL-750 Stibbins, and Trustee of the Appeal from the Delaware Circuit Warren E. Stibbins Revocable Court Trust, et al, The Honorable Marianne L. Appellants-Defendants, Vorhees, Judge Trial Court Cause No. v. 18C01-0902-PL-4 Carol (Stibbins) Pagano Foster, Angela Pagano, and Christopher Pagano, Appellees-Plaintiffs Baker, Judge. Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion on Rehearing 18A02-1410-PL-750 | December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 2 [1] The appellants have filed a petition for rehearing, raising a number of arguments with respect to our opinion in this case. We grant the petition for the limited purpose of striking the final sentence of footnote two, which shall now read as follows in its entirety: The expert testified that dozens of specimens of Warren’s handwriting were forgeries. She was also certain that the signatures of all of the witnesses to nearly all of the documents at issue in this litigation were forgeries. Carol found this expert on the Internet. The expert received her training from another Internet vendor who also offered programs on, among other things, how to predict the gender of unborn children through the handwriting of a parent. In all other respects, we deny the petition for rehearing. Bailey, J., and Mathias, J., concur. Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion on Rehearing 18A02-1410-PL-750 | December 16, 2015 Page 2 of 2