DocketNumber： 24A01-1210-CR-469
Citation Numbers： 993 N.E.2d 1182, 2013 WL 5010052, 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 433
Judges： Kirsch, Pyle, Vaidik
Filed Date： 9/13/2013
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/19/2024
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
For the reasons set forth in my dissent in Smith v. State, No. 24A01-1210-CR-469, 993 N.E.2d 1185, 2013 WL 5010978 (Ind.Ct.App. Sept. 13, 2013), I do not agree that Counts 4-6 can stand. I believe those charges, which allege that Smith knowingly, transacted business as a broker-dealer without being registered to do so, are also barred by double jeopardy. I therefore dissent as to these charges.