DocketNumber: No. 44439.
Citation Numbers: 284 N.W. 435, 226 Iowa 676
Judges: Hamilton, Mitchell, Richards, Stiger, Oliver, Hale, Bliss, Sager, Miller
Filed Date: 3/14/1939
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/9/2024
[1] Neither side has favored us with a brief and argument. The case is submitted on a transcript of the record and a printed abstract together with a denial and amendment to the abstract. The abstract was filed May 14, 1938, and nothing further has been filed by the defendant and no appearance was made for him in this court and, since the defendant has elected to present his appeal by printed abstract, it was his duty to prepare and file a brief containing brief points and authorities in support thereof. See Rules 32 and 34 of this court. See, also, State v. Johns,
"In law actions, we sit as a court for the correction of errors at law, and the precise error of which complaint is made must be substantially pointed out by the appellant. Such is our rule, and such is our uniform holding. State v. Vandewater,
[2] Just recently, in two civil suits, we held that to fail to file brief and argument raised a presumption that appellant had abandoned his appeal. See Walsh v. Pocahontas State Bank, Iowa,
[3] However, in compliance with section 14010, 1935 Code, we have carefully read the record as certified to this court and we fail to find any legal question affecting the substantial rights of the defendant. The evidence to sustain the conviction of the defendant is ample, showing beyond controversy that he was guilty as charged.
There does not seem to be any reason for disturbing the judgment of the district court and it is affirmed. — Affirmed.
MITCHELL, C.J., and RICHARDS, STIGER, OLIVER, HALE, BLISS, SAGER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.