Citation Numbers: 48 Iowa 675
Judges: Rothrock
Filed Date: 6/12/1878
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024
The motion must be sustained. The record shows that the demurrer was sustained on the 28th day of February, 1878. The defendant excepted, and was granted leave to amend his answer. It is further shown that special findings in writing, and a certificate of the judge that the demurrer involved “a principle of law that it is desirable to have the opinion of the Supreme Court,’’was filed March 6,1878. An amended certificate was filed on the 9th day of March, 1878, setting forth the principles of law on which it was desirable to have the opinion of this court. It is conceded that the court below adjourned the term on the 28th day of February, 1878.
The appellant files, with his argument in reply, a certificate of the judge setting forth that the findings of fact and law, and the certificate, were made as soon as could be done conveniently after the term.
This certificate is no part of the record in the court below. It was made long after the cause was disposed of there, and is, therefore, not a part of the proceedings. Under the rule announced in Bartle v. The City of Des Moines, 37 Iowa, 635, we cannot consider it.
Counsel for appellee stipulated in writing to waive a transcript and submit the cause upon appellant’s abstract, but reserved the right to move for a dismissal of the appeal.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is
Sustained.