Michael Lee Riley v. Jennifer Marie Benage

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 21-1254
Filed August 3, 2022
MICHAEL LEE RILEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
JENNIFER MARIE BENAGE,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Jennifer A. Miller,
Judge.
Michael Lee Riley appeals the denial of his application to modify the child
custody decree. AFFIRMED.
Ernest Kersten, Fort Dodge, for appellant.
Paul Berchenbriter of Iowa Legal Aid, Cedar Rapids, for appellee.
Considered by Bower, C.J., Greer, J., and Scott, S.J.*
*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206
(2022).
2
SCOTT, Senior Judge.
Michael Lee Riley and Jennifer Marie Benage have one child together.
Their stipulated custody and support decree was approved by the court and filed
in July 2020. The decree granted the parties joint legal custody and placed the
child in Jennifer’s physical care, provided a parenting schedule, and set child
support.
On October 21, 2021, Michael sought to modify the custody decree, place
the child in his physical care, order supervised visits, and suspend his child
support. He alleged that on September 2, Jennifer had been intoxicated and
assaulted him and the child.
After a hearing, the district court found:
In September of 2020, Jennifer came home from work to find
that Michael had entered her home and was sleeping in her bed. At
some point in the evening, she woke Michael up and asked him to
leave her house and he indicated to her that he would be taking [the
child] with him. Jennifer, who had been drinking and was intoxicated,
became angry and hit Michael and attempted to pull [the child] from
him and in the process scratched [the child] multiple times. Michael
left with [the child] and Jennifer called the police. Due to the injuries
sustained by both Michael and [the child], Jennifer was charged with
domestic assault and child endangerment. These charges were
eventually amended down and Jennifer pled guilty to disorderly
conduct and public intoxication. Michael testified that he requested
that the charges be amended down to simple misdemeanors so that
Jennifer could keep her job . . . .
The court noted the incident resulted in a child-abuse assessment and the
child’s temporary removal from Jennifer. Jennifer complied with all required
services, successfully completed alcohol treatment, and progressed from
supervised visits to the child being returned to her care; there is no further
involvement with the department of human services.
3
The court expressed concern about the incident, but found Jennifer did not
intend to harm the child and had immediately taken steps to address her
substance-abuse issue. It concluded the incident was isolated and not likely to
reoccur. Because Michael had failed to prove a substantial change of
circumstances, his application to modify the child custody decree was denied.
Michael appeals, challenging the court’s finding that no substantial change
in circumstances had been proved. See In re Marriage of Frederici, 338 N.W.2d
156, 158 (Iowa 1983) (stating modification of custody requires the applicant to
establish a substantial change of circumstances, more or less permanent, related
to the welfare of the child); see also Melchiori v. Kooi, 644 N.W.2d 365, 368 (Iowa
Ct. App. 2002) (stating an applicant in a modification action must show the ability
to offer superior care). On our de novo review, see Iowa R. App. P. 6.907, we
agree with the district court’s findings and conclusions. Further opinion would be
of little value. We affirm. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(d), (e).
AFFIRMED.