DocketNumber: No. 2006-SC-0352-KB
Citation Numbers: 199 S.W.3d 739, 2006 Ky. LEXIS 189, 2006 WL 2455624
Judges: Lambert
Filed Date: 8/24/2006
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024
OPINION AND ORDER
The Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) moves this Court to declare Respondent,
I. KBA File 12550
Respondent was properly served a charge by the Inquiry Commission on January 9, 2006, alleging four violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct in connection with his representation of Anthony Hammons in a criminal matter. Respondent did not respond to the charge or file a response in this action.
In representing Mr. Hammons, Respondent filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Sentence on December 30, 2003. In response, the government filed a Motion to Dismiss Respondent’s Motion. Respondent failed to respond in any way to this Motion to Dismiss filed by the government or otherwise follow up on Mr. Hammons’ case. The bar complainant, Mr. Hammon’s stepfather, stated that Respondent falsely’told him that he was doing everything that needed to be done in his stepson’s case, when in fact he was not. Mr. Hammons hired a different attorney who eventually filed a response to the government’s Motion to Dismiss.
The Board of Governors voted 11 to 7 to find Respondent guilty of the following charges, (1) failure to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client in violation of SCR 3.130-1.3; (2) failure to make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client in violation of SCR 3.130-3.2; (3) engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation in violation of SCR 3.130 — 8.3(c); and (4) knowingly failing to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority in violation of SCR 3.130 — 8.1(b).
II. KBA File 13143
Respondent was properly served a charge by the Inquiry Commission on January 5, 2006, alleging three violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct in connection with his representation of Estill Warner in a criminal matter. Respondent did not respond to the charge or file a response in this action.
After entering an Alford Plea to a charge of reckless homicide, Mr. Warner was sentenced to five years in prison in April 2004. Upon being sentenced, Mr. Warner began calling Respondent to ask him to file a Motion for Shock Probation. Respondent was alleged to have never returned Mr. Warner’s calls and to never have filed the Motion for Shock Probation. Respondent was charged with (1) failure to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client in violation of SCR 3.130-1.3; (2) .failure to respond to reasonable requests for information in violation of SCR 3.130-1.4(a); and (3) knowingly failing to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority in violation of SCR 3.130 — 8.1(b).
Because it was later discovered that Respondent did file a motion to suspend further execution of Mr. Warner’s sentence on January 28, 2005, the Board of Governors voted 19 to 0 to find Respondent not guilty of Counts I and II. However, the Board found Respondent guilty of Count III by a vote of 13 to 6.
IV. Conclusion
The record in this case indicates a pattern of noncompliance with the rules of Respondent’s chosen profession. Re
1. Rodney McDaniel, KBA Member No. 46027, is adjudicated guilty of all charges alleged in KBA File 12550 and Count III in KBA File 13143.
2. Rodney McDaniel is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky for a period of thirty (30) days.
3. In accordance with SCR 3.450, Respondent is directed to pay all costs associated with these disciplinary proceedings in the amount of $521.81 for which execution may issue from this Court upon finality of this Order.
4. This suspension shall run consecutively with any other disciplinary suspension.
ENTERED: August 24, 2006.