Citation Numbers: 305 S.W.2d 524
Filed Date: 9/27/1957
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/1/2021
The trial court held that the appellant could not collect under a theft provision of an insurance policy issued by the ap-pellee on a car because he failed to show ownership of the car. The amount in controversy was under $2,500 but over $200. We are affirming the judgment because we think the finding of the trial court was correct.
The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.