Judges: Makshali
Filed Date: 12/7/1847
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024
delivered ihe opinion of the Court.
The only question presented in this case is, whether under the statutes of 1837, (3 Stat. Law, 511,) and of 1845, (Sess. Acts, 80,) for equalizing taxation, and which 'in effect require the citizen to give in for taxation, in addition to the list of specific property, his own estimate, upon oath, of what he is worth in addition thereto, it is his duty to include in the estimate, debts due or coming due to him from persons resident in other States., and other property not situated within this State.
Upon considering the two statutes above referred to, we are satisfied that it was the object, and indeed the express requisition of the Legislature, that the citizens of this State should pay, in addition to the tax upon property required by law to be listed for taxation, an advabrem tax updn all that (according to their own estimation upon oath,) they were worth, exclusive of that property, leaving, out of the computation or estimate, according to the act of 1837, the first three hundred
Slaves temporarily out of the State at the time to which the list of taxable property refers, are of course, to be included in that list. The exception from the residuary estimate, applies to slaves permanently situated in another State or country, and therefore presumably constituting a part of the property taxable there.
Debts being of no place, but being in general regarded as attendant on the person of the creditor, may be considered as property within this State, though the debtor reside out of the State. But even if considered as property out of the State, they are at any rate a part of the property of the resident citizen, a part of his resources and a portion of the wealth of the State from which she.has a right to derive a part of her revenue and she has not exempted them from taxation, but requires them to be included in the estimate of what the citizen is
We are of opinion, therefore, in every view of the subject, that Hays was bound to include in his residuary estimate, not only the value of the debts coming to him from citizens or residents of this State, but also the value of debts from non-residents, and of all other property belonging to him out of the State, except land and slaves, and except such property out' of the State as under his oath he excludes from the estimate, because it is subject to taxation, (and should be given in for taxation,) by the laws of the country where it is situated.
Wherefore, the judgment and order dismissing the proceeding against the defendant, Hays, is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to render a judgment in conformity with this opinion, and for appropriate proceedings thereon.