Citation Numbers: 186 Ky. 102
Judges: Clay
Filed Date: 12/2/1919
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/24/2022
Opinion of the Court by
Affirming.
This appeal involves the ownership of a small tract of land in Letcher county.
Appellant, Joseph Yonts, claims title under deed from E. T. Webb and wife dated March 24, 1910, while appellee, S. E. Adams, claims title under a subsequent deed from the same parties. That being true, the question of title depends on whether the land in controversy was included in appellant’s deed, which contains the following description of the land conveyed:
“Beginning on a dogwood near the fence and lane that was between Ned Webb and Joe Webb on the left hand side of Bottom fork, going down; thence with what is now Ned Webb’s fence to top of ridge; thence a straight line to the back line of a survey made in the name of E. T. Webb; thence with the meanders of lines and marked comers of said survey back to the beginning so as to include twenty acres, more or less, include survey.”
It is conceded by the parties that the tract of land east of the line 3-9 passed by the deed, but insisted by appellant that not only that tract, but also the tract west of that line, which two tracts are covered by the survey of 1872, passed by the deed. It will be observed that the dogwood, which is the beginning corner of the tract conveyed to appellant, is not on any line of the survey of 1872. Therefore, in case of either construction it is necessary to leave the lines of that survey in order to reach the point of beginning. Had the grantor intended to convey all the land embraced by the survey, the natural thing would have been to say so, or to follow the description contained in the survey, without other words of qualification. While it is true that the words, ‘ ‘ include survey, ’ ’ are at the end of the description, these words must be interpreted in the light of the fact that the beginning corner was not on the survey, and of the further fact that the tract conveyed was to include only twenty acres, more or less. It appears that there are twenty-one acres east of the line 3-9, and thirty-two acres west of that line.
Judgment affirmed.