Judges: Tidpord
Filed Date: 12/20/1940
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/9/2024
Affirming.
The circumstances out of which this litigation arose were outlined in our opinion reported in
But, in 1939 the rule which treated as valid all indebtedness contracted within the amount which would have been available had the city levied the maximum tax permitted by the Constitution was no longer in force, and hence, the validity of the proposed bond issue in excess of $230,491.40, chargeable to 1938, depends upon whether an amount equivalent to that excess would have been available to the city had it realized its anticipated revenue based upon the taxes actually levied for that year. According to the City Comptroller the city's legally anticipated income for the year 1939, including license fees, etc., and "other receipts," exceeded the revenues actually collected by $211,805.04; but, since the amount of the uncollected taxes for that year alone, $137,404.71, exceeds the difference between the amount of the proposed bond issue and the floating indebtedness properly chargeable to 1938, it is unnecessary to pursue the inquiry further in order to determine that at least $350,000 of the total floating indebtedness was not incurred in violation of Section 157 of the Constitution.
The former city officials did not violate Section 158 of the Constitution, nor Section 157 of that instrument *Page 17 as construed prior to December 16, 1938, and, as said in our former opinion, the present officers of the city are making a praiseworthy effort to remedy the conditions which resulted in the deficiencies of revenue referred to. Hence we do not find it necessary to withhold our approval of the proposed bond issue as we are directed by statute to do where it appears that the officials in office at the time of the creation of the indebtedness have not had due regard for the finances of the municipality.
Judgment affirmed.