Citation Numbers: 70 S.W.2d 933, 254 Ky. 348
Judges: Drury
Filed Date: 4/20/1934
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Affirming. *Page 349
The banking commissioner recovered the following judgments against J.R. Blake, $500; J.S. Redwine, $5,500; Elbert Hargis, $3,700; J.P. Crain, $2,000; and A.H. Hargis, $38,000 from which the defendants have appealed.
These judgments were recovered upon a 100 per cent. assessment made upon these defendants as owners of the capital stock of the Hargis Bank Trust Company, and we shall state and dispose of the grounds for reversal as we reach them.
On July 12, 1932, the Breathitt circuit court found it would be necessary, and directed the banking commissioner, to make and collect a 100 per cent. assessment against the stockholders of the Hargis Bank Trust Company. On March 24, 1933, he filed in the Breathitt circuit court the pleading on which these judgments were taken, basing his cause of action upon the assessment made under the direction given him, his demand therefor made on the defendants and their failure to pay. To this the defendants undertook to plead limitations by alleging that more than six months, more than one year, and more than two years have elapsed *Page 350
since the Hargis Bank Trust Company failed. That is not sufficient. This action to recover judgments against these defendants is based on section 595 Ky. Stats., which is often called "The Double Liability Statute," it is a liability created by statute, and, hence, by section 2515, Ky. Stats., it must be enforced within five years after the cause of action accrues. When such a cause of action accrues is a matter about which courts are not agreed, see 7 C. J. p. 515, sec. 97, but in this state the cause of action is held to accrue when the liquidating officer is directed to make the assessment. See Calloway v. Glenn,
In 15 Rawle C. L. p. 1034, sec. 509, we find this:
"It is generally held that a judgment against a corporation is conclusive against its stockholders in an action to enforce their statutory liability to creditors, although they are not parties to the suit as individuals, and were not served, and were residents of other states."
The reason underlying this is that when these defendants became stockholders in this bank, they agreed it might represent them in the sphere of its activities, and section 595, Ky. Stats., became as much a part of their stock certificates as if written therein, and its contracts and liabilities became the contracts and liabilities of these defendants, "to the extent of the amount of their stock at par value in addition to the amount of such stock." The bank was before the court in the liquidation proceeding when this assessment was made, it represented its stockholders, and, when the court in the liquidation proceeding found this assessment would be necessary, that finding until modified by appropriate steps in that proceeding or corrected by appeal was in this proceeding conclusive not only on the bank but on its stockholders, thus represented by it.
The stockholders have no more right in this proceeding for the recovery of the assessment made against them to question the insolvency of this bank and the necessity for the assessment than they would have to *Page 352 reopen and relitigate a claim against the bank that had been reduced to judgment against it in the liquidation or any other proceeding, to which it was a party.
The judgments are affirmed.
Denny, State Banking Commr. v. Kennedy , 229 Ky. 178 ( 1929 )
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Denny v. Hargis Bank & Trust Co. , 233 Ky. 801 ( 1930 )
Corrington v. Crosby , 54 N.D. 614 ( 1926 )
Milner v. Gibson , 249 Ky. 594 ( 1933 )
Converse v. Hamilton , 32 S. Ct. 415 ( 1912 )