DocketNumber: No. 2012-CC-1398
Citation Numbers: 90 So. 3d 1034, 2012 La. LEXIS 1922, 2012 WL 2549818
Judges: Deny, Knoll
Filed Date: 6/20/2012
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
11 Considering the unique facts of this case, we find the district court abused its discretion in denying relator’s motion for continuance. Accordingly, the writ is granted, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the district court, which is instructed to grant relator’s motion for continuance.