DocketNumber： 93-KH-2898
Citation Numbers： 661 So. 2d 488
Filed Date： 10/13/1995
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 4/10/2017
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Denied. As to most of the documents relator requests, he has not shown the required particularized need. State ex rel. Bernard v. Cr. D.C., 94-2247 (La. 4/28/95), 653 So. 2d 1174. As to his request for his indictment, the Court declines to order production of documents it normally provides even in the absence of a showing of particularized need. Cf. State ex rel. Simmons v. State, 93-0275 (La. 12/16/94), 647 So. 2d 1094, in cases in which the limitations period of La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 has expired, unless the relator has made a showing of particularized need by filing an application which would fall under the exceptions of La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(A) and which needs the requested documents to support it. Bernard, 94-2247 at p. 2, 653 So.2d at 1175; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So. 2d 1189.
State Ex Rel. Bernard v. CRIM. DIST. COURT SECTION" J" , 653 So. 2d 1174 ( 1995 )
State Ex Rel. Simmons v. State , 647 So. 2d 1094 ( 1994 )
State Ex Rel. Payne v. State , 62 So. 3d 68 ( 2011 )
STATE EX REL. POYDRAS v. State , 83 So. 3d 1053 ( 2012 )
STATE EX REL. DOZIER v. State , 82 So. 3d 277 ( 2012 )
STATE EX REL. WILLIAMS v. State , 970 So. 2d 526 ( 2007 )
STATE EX REL. JOHNSON v. State , 996 So. 2d 1086 ( 2008 )
State Ex Rel. Degreat v. State , 724 So. 2d 205 ( 1998 )
State Ex Rel. Lewis v. State , 71 So. 3d 278 ( 2011 )
STATE EX REL. GOLDSTON v. State , 23 So. 3d 936 ( 2009 )
State Ex Rel. Washington v. State , 25 So. 3d 132 ( 2010 )
State Ex Rel. Brown v. State , 870 So. 2d 976 ( 2004 )
STATE EX REL. RATCLIFF v. State , 67 So. 3d 1244 ( 2011 )
STATE EX REL SMITH v. State , 38 So. 3d 319 ( 2010 )
State Ex Rel. Morrison v. State , 997 So. 2d 548 ( 2008 )
STATE EX REL. EVANS v. State , 34 So. 3d 857 ( 2010 )
STATE EX REL GATES v. State , 38 So. 3d 318 ( 2010 )
STATE EX REL. RUSSELL v. State , 25 So. 3d 794 ( 2009 )