DocketNumber: 51633
Citation Numbers: 252 So. 2d 667, 259 La. 770
Judges: Sanders
Filed Date: 10/1/1971
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/7/2017
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Application denied; on the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in their judgment.
SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted as to Assignment of Error No. 3.
TATE, J., feels that a writ should be granted due to the public importance of the question, even though (as the majority noted) under "the facts found by the Court of Appeal" (namely that the Master Plan putting property owners on notice was not filed until after the subdivision plan and building permit were denied) the result in this case may be correct.
Paradyne Corp. v. State, Dept. of Transp. , 528 So. 2d 921 ( 1988 )
Ventures in Property I v. City of Wichita , 225 Kan. 698 ( 1979 )
Smith v. Board of Com'rs of Port of New Orleans , 262 La. 96 ( 1972 )
Howard v. Hardware Mutual Company , 286 So. 2d 334 ( 1973 )
Christopher Estates, Inc. v. PARISH, ETC. , 413 So. 2d 1336 ( 1982 )
Old Jefferson Civic Ass'n Inc. v. Planning Com'n , 364 So. 2d 193 ( 1978 )
Howard County v. jjM, Inc. , 301 Md. 256 ( 1984 )
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission , 107 S. Ct. 3141 ( 1987 )