DocketNumber: 93-KH-1380
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 1/12/1996
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/11/2017
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
PER CURIAM.
We grant the application in order to rule definitively on the issue of whether a person may raise the question of excessiveness of sentence in a post-conviction application. La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 930.3, which sets out the exclusive grounds for granting post-conviction relief, provides no basis for review of claims of excessiveness or other sentencing error post-conviction. See State v. Gibbs, 620 So. 2d 296 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993); cf. State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330, p. 7, 11-14 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So. 2d 1189, 1194, 1196-98. Accordingly, relator's claim for post-conviction relief based on the excessiveness of his sentence is denied.
Montgomery v. Louisiana ( 2016 )
STATE EX REL. LOMAS v. State ( 2011 )
STATE EX REL. WILSON v. State ( 2008 )
STATE EX REL. FISH v. State ( 2009 )
State Ex Rel. Brooks v. State ( 2011 )
STATE EX REL. BRANCH v. State ( 2011 )
STATE EX REL. JONES v. State ( 2011 )
State Ex Rel. Young v. State ( 2011 )
State Ex Rel. White v. State ( 2011 )
State Ex Rel. Brooks v. State ( 2011 )
STATE EX REL. JONES v. State ( 2010 )
STATE EX REL. LINDSEY v. State ( 2010 )
STATE EX REL. HOLMES v. State ( 2010 )
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. State ( 2010 )
STATE EX REL. GRANT v. State ( 2012 )