DocketNumber： 93-KH-1380
Citation Numbers： 665 So. 2d 1172, 1996 La. LEXIS 168, 1996 WL 15590
Judges： Per Curiam
Filed Date： 1/12/1996
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 4/11/2017
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
PER CURIAM.
We grant the application in order to rule definitively on the issue of whether a person may raise the question of excessiveness of sentence in a post-conviction application. La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 930.3, which sets out the exclusive grounds for granting post-conviction relief, provides no basis for review of claims of excessiveness or other sentencing error post-conviction. See State v. Gibbs, 620 So. 2d 296 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993); cf. State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330, p. 7, 11-14 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So. 2d 1189, 1194, 1196-98. Accordingly, relator's claim for post-conviction relief based on the excessiveness of his sentence is denied.
Montgomery v. Louisiana , 135 S. Ct. 1546 ( 2016 )
STATE EX REL. LOMAS v. State , 63 So. 3d 971 ( 2011 )
STATE EX REL. WILSON v. State , 2008 La. LEXIS 1427 ( 2008 )
STATE EX REL. FISH v. State , 5 So. 3d 160 ( 2009 )
State v. Singleton , 2010 La. LEXIS 991 ( 2010 )
State v. Singleton , 77 So. 3d 953 ( 2012 )
State Ex Rel. Brooks v. State , 76 So. 3d 1198 ( 2011 )
State v. Lathan , 2011 La. App. LEXIS 597 ( 2011 )
STATE EX REL. BRANCH v. State , 68 So. 3d 526 ( 2011 )
STATE EX REL. JONES v. State , 76 So. 3d 1191 ( 2011 )
State Ex Rel. Young v. State , 63 So. 3d 997 ( 2011 )
State Ex Rel. White v. State , 63 So. 3d 1031 ( 2011 )
State Ex Rel. Brooks v. State , 67 So. 3d 1251 ( 2011 )
State v. Nelson , 10 La.App. 5 Cir. 760 ( 2011 )
STATE EX REL. JONES v. State , 48 So. 3d 290 ( 2010 )
STATE EX REL. LINDSEY v. State , 42 So. 3d 387 ( 2010 )
STATE EX REL. HOLMES v. State , 38 So. 3d 315 ( 2010 )
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. State , 38 So. 3d 351 ( 2010 )
STATE EX REL. GRANT v. State , 85 So. 3d 136 ( 2012 )