DocketNumber: No. 39282.
Citation Numbers: 43 So. 2d 217, 216 La. 58
Judges: HAWTHORNE, Justice.
Filed Date: 11/7/1949
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
[28] I agree that the writ of mandamus must be denied in this proceeding for the reason that the petition addressed to the Shreveport City Council requests the submission (to the vote of the people) of an ordinance relating to two distinct and independent propositions, as a consequence of which the desired election if held (as well as the proposed ordinance if adopted) would be invalid.
[29] However, I maintain that on this appeal, in the interest of avoiding a multiplicity of suits, this court should pass upon the other question squarely presented by the exceptions of no right and no cause of action, and on which the trial judge ruled in rendering his decision, it being whether the right of initiative and referendum, under Section 14 of Act No.