DocketNumber: No. 32169.
Citation Numbers: 155 So. 770, 179 La. 1048
Judges: ROGERS, Justice.
Filed Date: 5/21/1934
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
Relator appeals from a judgment rejecting on the ground of laches his demand for reinstatement and back salary as a civil service employee of the respondent board. Relator was employed indifferently as watchman and laborer by the respondent board from May 21, 1925, to October 17, 1930, on which date, while working as a laborer, he was discharged. Relator was one of a number of employees whose services were dispensed with by the respondent board in the reorganization of its forces and departments necessitated by decrease of work and reduction of revenues. Under section 1 of Act No.
Relator's suit was filed on April 28, 1932. During the time elapsing between the date of his discharge and the date his suit was filed, no promise was made relator he would be reinstated, and relator was given no cause to believe his discharge would be reconsidered by the respondent board.
It is well settled that the right of a public employee to be reinstated in his employment may be lost by laches or unreasonable delay in asserting that right. Crais v. City *Page 1050
of New Orleans,
Relator delayed for eighteen months and eleven days before bringing his suit, and in our opinion is guilty of such laches as will defeat his right to reinstatement, if any such right ever existed.
For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.