DocketNumber: 85-C-1531
Judges: Calogero
Filed Date: 10/21/1985
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/8/2017
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. The contention of laches may not be raised by exception; assuming without deciding that laches is available in Louisiana, it may be urged only as an affirmative defense. See LSA-C.C.P. art. 1005, Comment (e). The judgments of the trial court and Court of Appeal are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings according to law.
DIXON, C.J., concurs in the grant and reversal and remand. There is no "laches" in La., C.C. 3457. I would remand to determine whether plaintiff abandoned his position or waived his rights.
CALOGERO, J., would simply grant the writ and bring the case up.
La. State Med. Soc. v. La. State Bd. of Nursing ( 1986 )
Hartman Ent. v. Ascension-St. James ( 1991 )
Walker Resources, Inc. v. Jif's Petroleum Services, Inc. ( 1989 )
Resolution Trust Corp. v. International Insurance ( 1991 )
Mason v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. ( 2000 )