DocketNumber: 54567
Judges: Tate
Filed Date: 4/11/1974
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/7/2017
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Not considered. Not timely filed. No postmark on envelope.
TATE, J., is of the opinion the writ should be considered. The intent of the rule is that timely mailing is considered timely filing.
Berry v. Holston Well Service, Inc. ( 1986 )
Fountain v. Central Louisiana Elec. Co. ( 1991 )
Teague v. Sawyer Drilling Co. ( 1986 )
Benoit v. Grey Wolf Drilling, Inc. ( 1987 )
East Parker Properties, Inc. v. Pelican Realty Co. ( 1976 )
Bowens v. General Motors Corp. ( 1992 )