DocketNumber: No. 54022
Judges: Barham, Dixon, Marcus, Reasons, Sanders, Summer, Summers
Filed Date: 6/10/1974
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024
Relator, Darrel Eugene Todd, has been found guilty and sentenced under a charge of possession, sale and exhibition of obscene material, in violation of R.S. MilOó.
The argument is made in the instant case that this defendant was informed, in answer to a bill of particulars, that the prosecution was proceeding under R.S. 14:106(A) (7), as well as under R.S. 14:106 (A)(2) and (3). The contention is then made that R.S. 14:106(A)(7) is constitutional and that the conviction and sentence can stand.
For the reasons stated by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v. California, supra, and by this Court in previous decisions, we are mandated to declare R. S. 14:106 (A) (7) unconstitutional. We adhere to the previous holdings in regard to R.S. 14:106(A) (2) and (3).
Since R.S. 14:106(A) (2) (3) and (7) are unconstitutional under the United States Supreme Court pronouncement in Miller v. California, supra, the conviction and sentence are annulled.
. Relator first appealed to this Court after conviction in the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans on three counts of a bill of information charging him with obscenity. He was sentenced to pay a fine of $300 or serve 60 days on each of the three counts. The cumulative sentence was $900 or 180 days. Appellate jurisdiction in that instance vested under La.Const. Art. 7, § 10. In May of 1973 we remanded the case to the district court for re-sentencing on one count only. State v. Todd, 278 So.2d 36 (La.1973).
. On remand to the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, relator was sentenced to pay a fine of $300 or serve 60 days in the. Parish Prison on the one count. He then appealed to the appellate division of the